Those of us of the Looney Tunes generation (Elmer Fudd in a metal bustier singing “I’m going to kill the waaaabbitt”) have a hard time taking opera seriously. And that’s a good thing. Opera is like wine – it’s wonderful unless there’s some wine pedant around yapping on about “an oaky sheen” and “a florescent bouquet”.

Così fan tutte played in Vancouver last night – Mozart’s opera about – get this – two guys that make a bet that their girlfriends will never be unfaithful, then dress up as different guys and seduce each other’s girlfriends, thus losing the bet, their girlfriends (sort of), and their general happiness and well-being. The fact that they’ve cruelly deceived and manipulated their girlfriends is not an issue – “Così fan tutte”, all women are the same. Continue reading »

little oi“It was the kind of landscape that had a particular type of story attached to it … a story that flapped wings against the moon…

‘Der flabbergast,’ muttered Nanny.

‘What’s that?’ said Magrat.

‘It’s foreign for bat.’”

–Terry Pratchett, “Witches Abroad”

Michael Geist (in the article “Say no to Big Brother plan for Internet” in The Toronto Star) describes the “Lawful Access Initiative” rattling around Ottawa. This is the one about making it easy for the police to eavesdrop on internet traffic, forcing ISPs to store and reveal usage information about their customers (and preventing ISPs from informing their customers when they’ve revealed private data) and allowing monster TelCos to discriminate against technologies like VoIP.

Also in the article is information about MP Sarmite Bulte’s initiative to abide by special restrictions regarding public domain content, by requiring them to apply for extended license. Upshot: even if a work is in the public domain, a school would have to pay fees to use it unless the work gave them explicit permission. sheeesh.

Write letters to these jokers. Dead trees and snail mail is better than email. My letter is attached, but don’t just copy it – write your own. Continue reading »

little oi
This week’s readings and assignments for my Philosophy Lite course are on the topic: “Does God Exist”. Because this is Phil. Lite, we get to cut to the chase: Anselm’s Ontological Argument in eight easy steps; E.O. Wilson’s genetic explanations of religious impulses distilled into a quarter page. Can’t beat that – in my (limited) previous experience with readings in philosophy, the problem is not understanding the arguments, it’s ferreting the damn things out of the massive wodges of tortuous prose in which they’re buried.

The fondness for massive wodges of tortuous prose starts early. In Philosophy Lite, we have to write Term Paper Lite – five double-spaced pages (minimum) arguing a philosophical point. Five pages minimum. What if I am able to refute Liebniz in three-and-a-half pages? What if I can demolish Kant in a paragraph? Continue reading »

It annoys me that Monty Python is a pervasive social reference in my head. Nothing against Monty Python; god knows, they’ve made me laugh to the point of apoplexy many times. But now I can’t use the phrase “the means of production” without the image of Karl Marx on a game-show panel popping into my head. In my Saturday morning “Philosophy Lite” course yesterday, the mention of “Emmanual Kant” made me have to turn a giggle into a cough. (It is not cool to laugh at the name “Emmanual Kant” during a philosophy lecture.)

In the February 5-11 edition of The Economist, the Economics Focus column discusses a recent paper in the Yale Law Journal by Yochnai Benkler titled “Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production” (available in PDF).

The first question, puzzling to practitioners of the dismal science, is why people – specifically open-source programmers – freely give away the products of their effort done outside of their employment hours. Where’s the “Rational Actor”? Where’s “Self-Interest”? Where’s the pay-back?

The “pure economic” theories tend to run along the lines of subtle pay-back: reputation and prestige leading to greater job prospects. The “social economic” theories talk about communities of reciprocity and trust that benefit all members. (The “geek economics” theories say: “What else would I do with my Friday night?” and “Dude, I need to WiFi my toaster.”)

And then there are characteristics of the computing field itself that influence this economic motivation: Continue reading »

From the Bibliophile Bookshelf. A naming of parts: SEXTODECIMO paging, MULLing the TEXT-BLOCK, the FLY TITLE page…all of which would be boring even to a book geek like me if it weren’t for gems of trivia and humour:

“In the previous centuries, some people who were more financially well off than others, preferred to pick their bindings, for this purpose some books were sold in WRAPS. A paper cover was wrapped around the TEXT-BLOCK. Once the book was sold, the new owner could deliver it to his favorite binder and have it bound to suit his library’s decor; Blue or plaid, or faux gold lame’ alligator.”

“SPINE, BOARDS, MULL, HINGES, ‘ENDPAPERS’, SIGNATURES, LEAVES, WORDS….words…words…mon dieux! we forgot the words! I thought you had them! ARGH!!”


image courtesy of holder on morguefile

A DocBook Wiki! (That is, a Wiki front-end to a DocBook back-end, not a Wiki about DocBook) love this idea – mostly because this morning in the shower I thought “The World Needs a DocBook Wiki!”, and, lo and behold, the world has one.

Why is this a good idea?

  • because wiki content is not portable – the markup is embedded
  • because wiki markup only makes sense to the wiki rendering engine
  • because it would be easy to map the limited number markup tags used in a wiki to DocBook tags
  • because DocBook is a beatiful thing; wiki content stored in DocBook format becomes data

In this article in The Guardian an autistic savant describes the view from inside his own head. (“When I multiply numbers together, I see two shapes. The image starts to change and evolve, and a third shape emerges.”)

Daniel Tammet can speak eight languages (including one he devised himself) and can calculate pi to 22,514 decimal places. And, unusually for a person with autism, he is highly articulate – he can describe the perceptions and processes that occur in his mind.

The Experts are Interested, to say the least. “It’s too early to tell, but we hope it might throw some light on why we don’t all have savant abilities.”

That sentence sends a chill up my spine, because the logical extension is: “By studying Daniel, we might learn how to enable savant abilities in the general population.”

My coworker Andy blogged His Ideal Fight. I think men are at a disadvantage when it comes to fantasy fighting, even if the demographics around slaughter movies and pile-’o-corpses video games suggests otherwise. Women have deeply repressed desires to kick the shit out of someone(s), but they’ve been so effectively de-socialized regarding violence that these desires are left to grumble and stomp around in their alligator brains.

My dream fight, like Andy’s, starts with a real incident: Recently, while walking my dog, I was followed for a couple of blocks (weirdly and scarily deserted in the middle of the day) by a psychotic junkie screaming threats and invective. Most of the Psychotic Junkie’s dialog below is from the real incident, except for his screaming.

=====================

Cue danger-type music (Jaws-ish, but not Jaws)
Camera: pan to show deserted streets, gradually pull in as junkie approaches the soon-to-be victim (me)

little oiOver the soundtrack, we hear a low, ominous growl (Oi the Beagle doesn’t really have a low, ominous growl in her vocal repertoire – she has a kind of chain-saw rrrRRRrrrYIP! sound she saves for the seagulls that land on our skylight – but, hey, it’s my dream.)

Psychotic Junkie: Where ya going, ya ****ing **nt? Why the hurry? (peals of evil Psychotic Junkie laughter)

Jen and Oi walk faster. (This is a theatrical device known as “suspense”.) Continue reading »

© 2011 jeneralize Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha